When I first started to play 4th Edition I was DMng and playing (a state of affairs I used to find myself in often), and so I needed to make a character.Oh, I knew what I wanted to play. We were re-creating our first campaign, and so I was going to re-envision my first DnD character: Xenith Amakiir, the paladin of Bahamut. I knew exactly how I wanted to do it this time around, too. I wanted Xenith to be an eladrin, because elves and teleportation together was just too cool for me to not mix. I also wanted to multiclass into warlock with a fey pact, because Xenith's former job had involved... pleasantries... with a fey that could have been called the Summer Queen from the Manual of the Planes. Xenith was going to keep paying visits to this fey for his usual jollies, while being a faithful follower of Bahamut, right? Right.
But as I read through my Player's Handbook in my first two days of getting it I noticed something that was a bitter disappointment: the character wasn't going to work. For those of you who aren't familiar with 4th edition, here's why:
- Both classes are multi-stat, splitting the class powers cleanly between two main attack stats, and rely upon a tertiary stat for the classes abilities
- While eladrin do have a bonus to Intelligence, they don't have a boost to Charisma (they do now thanks to errata, but they didn't then).
Examples: When's the last time you saw an eladrin swordmage, a class that they're practically made for? Or a dwarf bard? Or a dragonborn spellsword?
The fact that these race-class combos can be made to work is besides the point. People want to take advantage of the good math that's associated with the racial stats. It's rare to see someone work against those stat boosts. And while it does happen the fact remains: people are loathe to go against those all-important stat bonuses. Even though adding more options in Essentials was a nice gesture, it still puts the players in an imaginary straightjacket. What I want to do is remove the straightjacket and let the nuts run loose in the nut-house.
Rules
Remove all ability modifiers from all races; no races get a +2 to any stat. Ignore all stat generation rules in the rulebooks. Use these stat generation rules instead.
Stat Generation
Balanced: When generating stats you get an 18, 16, and a 10 to put where you wish. Then roll 2d6+6 "straight down the line" for the rest (see example).
Split Stats: You get two 18's and two 10's to put where you wish. After that roll 2d6+6 and apply them wherever you like. (see example).
Example of Balanced Stats: I decide to make a dragonborn fighter that uses hammers. I give my fighter a Strength of 18 and a Constitution of 16. I put my 10 in my Intelligence. I roll 2d6+6 three times: 13, 16, 10. The remaining stats (in order from top to bottom) are Dexterity, Wisdom, and Charisma. I apply them "straight down the line". My stats are Strength 18, Constitution 16, Dexterity 13, Wisdom 16, and Charisma 10.
Example of Split Stats: I decide to pick an eladrin paladin multiclassed into warlock. A paladin's main stat is Strength (in my houserules), so I give it an 18, and a warlock's is Charisma (in my houserules) so I give it an 18 as well. I decide to put a 10 in my Intelligence, and the other 10 in my Wisdom. I roll two more times: 14 and 13. Looking at my character sheet, I see the rest of the stats, and they (in order of top-to-bottom): Constitution, Dexterity, and Wisdom. I apply them wherever I like: Constitution 14 and Dexterity 13. These are the final stats: Strength 18, Constitution 13, Dexterity 14, Intelligence 10, Wisdom 10, and Charisma 18.
These rules will allow any class to be combined with any race for story reasons, as opposed to game reasons. There is almost reason to not use this houserule, period. The benefits of doing this are just too good. I mean, I have a shardmind battlemind who has just as good of stats as the halfling rogue who's also in the same group. These people both picked races and classes they thought were cool, and didn't have to finagle with the character to give them something that worked well. They could both have fun. And that's what's important.
EDIT: I forgot to mention what I was covering next week. Next week will be the first installment of Player's Handbook 1: Cleric, Paladin, Ranger, and Warlock, the V-Classes!
So, I see where you're coming from, but I also don't quite like getting rid of stat bonuses.
ReplyDeleteI do agree that it can be a bit restrictive on class selection, especially if you want to multiclass like that, but I find a sort of pleasure at managing to make a combination work with an odd race.
My favorite character to date so far was a changeling invoker. Invokers use Wisdom/Con, and changelings are Charisma and Int/Dex. The stats worked out fine, as the off-bonuses gave me interesting stats, even though a bunch of my points went into the two primary ones.
As for your initial problem with a paladin/warlock, that wasn't a problem once eladrins got the Charisma bonus, although it depends on the timeframe of when you were playing, as the Charisma based paladin build wasn't really supported until Divine Power.
As for an eladrin swordmage, there's quite a lot of support for such a thing. In the last season of Encounters, I played an Eladrin Bladesinger and it was amazing. I was in the thick of melee, swinging and tossing around blasts of power. And I had an amazing AC, it was actually a unique way of playing a wizard. There's also the arcane defender, whose actual class might be swordmage. Not to mention there's a whole paragon path and a good few feats that let Eladrin wizards cast through their blades.
I'm not saying your system is bad, but I'm saying that maybe it'd be slightly improved if you kept one iconic stat bonus for a class, then had the other be from the background of the character. So, an Eladrin would have a bonus to intelligence, but if your character had a background as a guardian or a priest, it might be con or wisdom.
I can understand wanting a weird combo to work, but most beginners I've trained don't care about "making something work", they just want their cool idea to work. I'd prefer to not make them know the "joys" of manipulating the system. And I know I don't particularly enjoy that either.
ReplyDeleteBladesinger's different from a swordmage, actually.
I personally find that that race's features are more than iconic enough that we don't need the stat boosts to make races different from each other. The "iconic stat" is entirely unnecessary because of the distinctness of 4th's races. I just see no point in keeping a sacred cow that doesn't even taste good as steak.